SLE Ticker

18 Years and counting...Got SL News? Get it Published! Contact Lanai Jarrico at

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Second Life Terms of Service- Nomad Aries Reporting…

On August 15th, 2013 Second Life users were issued a new Terms of Service Agreement upon logging into this virtual world.  If you are here, then you accepted the new TOS Agreement License.

 There are major differences between the preceding TOS and the new TOS. One difference in particular has caused uproar amongst Content Creators in Second Life, with good reason.  

Below, in excerpt, is section 2.3 of the August 2013 TOS.
 This is the section that has caused residents of Second Life, especially Content Creators, the most concern. 

2.3 You grant Linden Lab certain licenses to your User Content
" you agree to grant to Linden Lab, the non-exclusive, unrestricted, unconditional, unlimited, worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, and cost-free right and license to use, copy, record, distribute, reproduce, disclose, sell, re-sell, sublicense (through multiple levels), modify, display, publicly perform, transmit, publish, broadcast, translate, make derivative works of, and otherwise exploit in any manner whatsoever, all or any portion of your User Content (and derivative works thereof), for any purpose whatsoever in all formats, on or through any media, software, formula, or medium now known or hereafter developed, and with any technology or devices now known or hereafter developed, and to advertise, market, and promote the same."

What Does that Mean for Second Life Users?
At an October 2013 meeting at the Rose Theatre in Second Life, members of the Second Life Bar Association and the United Content Creators of Second Life explained what this agreement means legally for all residents.
You may see this meeting on Youtube here .  The meeting is lengthy, approximately two hours long.

For those of you who cannot sit through a long meeting I will explain what the TOS agreement means legally according to Agenda Faromet of the SLBA. 

When you create something you have exclusive rights over your creation.  When using the various forms of media on the internet you give certain permissions. That is how facebook , Twitpic, Linkedin, Youtube,  for example, work.  When you have exclusive rights you have the right to make copies, share or transfer, modify, publicly perform or publicly display your creation. Any activity on the internet involves all of these. You give your permission to these services to be able to do this.  That is how the internet works.  Non-exclusive means more than one person has the rights to do the above with something you created.  Perpetual means never ending, it goes on forever. Irrevocable means you cannot take back your permission.  Sub- Licensable means permission is passed on to other parties without the permission of the creator, it is not necessary to get permission from the creator. Unlimited means, there are no limits or restrictions.   
Agreeing to the newest TOS from Linden Labs gives Linden Labs permission to do anything they wish, whatsoever, with your content.  As Agenda said, "The Terms of Service Agreement,( August 2013) is ;" non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, world-wide, unrestricted, unconditional and unlimited". 

 The words "sell" and "re-sell" are included in section 2.3 of the TOS, however, as explained by Agenda, these terms are usually used in Patent and Trade Secrets agreements not in Copyright agreements.  You should note that Linden Labs can sell and resell your content even if those words were not included in the TOS.   

There it is, the reason many people are confused, angry and fearful about their work on Second Life. It is not a user friendly agreement as the preceding TOS was. These type of user agreements are everywhere on the net and some are "friendlier" than others. Linden Labs has stated it was their attempt to streamline their business by creating a TOS to cover their products. As for Linden Labs' other products, this TOS may serve them well, however, in the case of Second Life it has presented some great difficulties. 

What could improve this TOS Agreement?  
The conclusion of the meeting in October produced the following recommendations on improving the TOS Agreement:

To improve the TOS, the agreement must contain; a) A limit for the purpose for which content can be used b) A limit to the scope for content uploaded to LL Services so content will only be used within the scope of the licenses. c) A limit to the Terms of the license, if you delete something or close your account the license ends (for example). 
The August TOS 2013 includes all content presently existing and in the future, content before the 2013 TOS is also included in this license.  To try to cover content by date, time and existing licenses at the time of use, would not be a viable method for any company to attempt. 

Many groups and individuals contacted Linden Labs asking for clarification or requesting revision or at least a meeting to discuss the TOS.  The TOS was the subject of blogs, and gamer magazines and internet sites.  One such site, Wagner James Au's NEW WORLD NOTES, received an answer from Peter Gray, Linden Lab's spokesman on September 12, 2013.

 You can read the entire response online at 

Below is an excerpt from the response from Peter Gray, LL, to Wagner James Au's New World Notes blog:

"As evidenced by Second Life’s extensive history, functionality and well-documented policies for providing a platform on which users can create and profit from their creations, Linden Lab respects the proprietary rights of Second Life’s content creators. We regret that our intention in revising our Terms of Service to streamline our business may have been misconstrued by some as an attempt to appropriate Second Life residents’ original content. We have no intention of abandoning our deep-rooted dedication to facilitating residents’ ability to create and commercialize such content in Second Life. In fact, we strive to provide Second Life’s residents with evermore opportunities to do so."

For more than a month this writer has spent countless hours reading every document, blog, article and discussion on the latest TOS Agreement for Second Life.  This is the best example of Linden Lab's response to the reaction of residents to the TOS Agreement, it was sent to a number of bloggers and websites.  Repeatedly, Linden Labs declares it is" not their intent to appropriate Second Life resident's original content".  

If it is not Linden Lab's intent to appropriate Second Life resident's original content why is it not clarified in the TOS?   If the TOS does not include or reflect the intent of Linden Labs then a revision would be in order.  For anyone who has spent hours pouring over the TOS agreement, it is not a matter of misconstruing the terms in the TOS as Mr. Gray suggests. The TOS is a legal, binding agreement and in its' present form, it clearly gives the rights to Linden Labs to appropriate Second Life resident's original content

  As residents of Second Life, we can only deal with what is written in the TOS and from a legal standpoint, the TOS as it presently exists, does not reflect the intent mentioned in the above statement from Mr. Gray and repeatedly from Linden Labs. Linden Labs needs to revise, clarify and limit this TOS in order to reflect clearly what the purpose of this agreement intends. 

Recent replies from Linden Labs state that they will review the TOS but it will take time.  A new CEO, Ebbe Altberg, joined Linden Labs on February 10, 2014.  Mr. Altberg hasn't really had time to delve into the TOS Agreement as of yet although in his introductory remarks, he maintains much the same position as Mr. Gray's response in September 2013.

 It has now been over six months since the Terms of Service Agreement was introduced to the residents of Second Life.  How much time it will take for a review and revision of the TOS is anyone's guess.  Would it be impossible for Linden Labs to revert to the older TOS, preceding the 2013 one, while Linden Labs reviews and revises the present TOS?  The preceding TOS wasn't perfect, but it was workable. This would go a long way to calm the residents of Second Life and could be shown as an act of good will from Linden Labs while it corrects the flawed TOS, 2013. 

The more time passes it creates more speculation, conspiracy theories and lack of trust . As expressed on many blogs some creators have left SL and some are continuing on trying to find a solution, maintaining their content but not producing any new content and waiting for further response from Linden Labs.  One detailed blog on the immediate effects of the TOS so far on Second Life is Hypergridbusiness:

It is a difficult position to be in,  on the one hand, we have the troublesome, all encompassing TOS, which clearly needs some form of revision and on the other, we have Linden Labs stating they have no intent whatsoever of appropriating Second Life resident's original content even though their TOS says just that.  One side is legally binding and carries a lot of weight; the other is not and doesn't do much to quell resident's concern. Therein lies the dilemma. We wait and hope we hear news from Linden Labs regarding revising the existing TOS soon. 


  1. It seems to me that there is a lot of overreaction to the revised ToS from the content creators. This version of the ToS contains some bizarre statements, but does anyone really believe that Linden Lab is going to steal someone's bling shoes and sell them on the black market? At most, the response should be "Why did you word this sentence in this way?" Instead, some people are competing with others to come up with the most extreme reaction. I have seen two external websites associated with 3D mesh creations where the owners have posted statements prohibiting their content from being used in Second Life. There's no way they would be able to tell if it's being used in SL, and even without the revised ToS, the griefers can copybot anything, so your very special mesh products weren't safe to begin with.

    I was reading a discussion in one of the blogs where someone speculated that some of the wording about displaying and copying, recording and transmitting, might be giving LL a license to save your item on their hard disk and display it to someone else on their computer monitor. That is a sensible explanation, but it doesn't explain why they would need to sell or resell or make derivative works. There are many questions about the ToS, and unfortunately there is no discussion interface between Linden Lab and its customers anymore, so we will have to wait for a pronouncement from on high and hope it's a good one.

    Thanks for the article. It's good to keep this issue in front of people.

  2. Well, I was wanting to learn to model some things for Daz3d and I found marvelous designer and tutorials for creating content for secondlife. I was thinking about creating for secondlife and getting my daughter into it and making clothes. But the terms of service pretty much mean , I won't, period. You couldn't pay me to go create content and give it away forever for crumbs. No one is over reacting to terms of service that lay claim to everything people upload. (Not that all those people own the right to upload it anyway.) What anyone says it means is crap and their comments about it are just misleading. "No we aren't trying to steal your stuff" "But it says so right here..." So well, I don't want to get an account and model things for secondlife. And yeah that means I won't have one and my kids won't either.


Comments will be reviewed and posted within 24 hours. Please note any abusive content or outside promotional links may not be approved.